Dekel Bar vs Shane Monroe Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W L L W L
Form
W L L W L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Bar 1 - 0 Monroe
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bar winning 2 and Monroe winning 0. The last match between Bar and Monroe was at the Binghamton Challenger, 23-07-2017, Q3, Hard with Dekel Bar getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dekel Bar | 1 |
| Shane Monroe | 0 |
Binghamton Challenger(23-07-2017)
6
2
6
4
| Bar | Stats | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 593 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 32 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 43% (126-166) | Career Total W/L | 39% (11-17) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Dekel Bar
Player
Shane Monroe
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:27:23 | Average Match Time | 1:27:23 |
| 73% (36/49) | 1st Serve % | 63% (32/51) |
| 75% (27/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 62% (8/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 51% (26/51) | Return Points Win % | 29% (14/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dekel Bar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ram Kapach
Player
Dekel Bar
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Edan Bakshi
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Dekel Bar
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve %
50%
(
2 of
4)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
33%
(
1 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
8
Total Points Won
2
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Dekel Bar
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Shane Monroe
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Kushaan Nath
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Dekel Bar
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Edward Nguyen
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve %
43%
(
41 of
96)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
6
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ronnie Schneider
Player
Dekel Bar
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
Player
Dekel Bar
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shane Monroe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43% (126/166) | Win/Loss | 39% (11/17) |
| 44% (289/374) | Sets Win/Loss | 39% (24/37) |
| 48% (2917/3157) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (261/298) |
| 44% (126/159) | Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 41% (9/13) |
| 0% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 395 | Aces Total | 1 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 518 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 561.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 332.36 |
| 60% (4451/7450) | 1st Serve % | 71% (116/163) |
| 68% (3013/4451) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (66/116) |
| 49% (1457/2998) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (24/47) |
| 44% (299/687) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (7/28) |
| 39% (2875/7342) | Return Points Win % | 40% (69/174) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/6) | Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 44% (123/159) | Futures W/L | 38% (10/16) |
| 43% (125/289) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (11/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (34/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 54% (44/82) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 85% (129/110) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (9/8) |
| 14% (129/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (9/1) |
| 10% (163/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (19/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
